QBCore vs. QBus : quelle est la vraie différence ?

Okay, let’s talk QBCore and QBus. If you’re into FiveM roleplay servers, especially the ones that pride themselves on customisation, you’ve probably heard these names thrown around. You might even be wondering: are they the same thing? What’s the deal? Let’s clear up the confusion.

From ESX to QBus, then QBCore

To understand the relationship between QBCore and QBus, we need to rewind a bit. It all starts with ESX, or “ES Extended”. ESX was one of the earliest and most popular frameworks for building FiveM roleplay servers. It was a game-changer, making it easier to add custom features.

But like all things, ESX had limitations. That’s where QBus came in. QBus was essentially an evolution of ESX, built with the idea of being more efficient and flexible. It took the core concepts of ESX and improved upon them.

Now, QBCore steps into the ring. QBCore is, in many ways, a direct descendant of QBus. It’s built on the shoulders of QBus’s framework and has become a popular choice for server owners who want a highly customisable experience.

So, Is QBCore Just a Rebrand of QBus?

This is where it gets interesting. The short answer is: it’s complicated.

QBCore isn’t simply a rebrand. It’s more like a fork, a branch in the road. The developers of QBCore took the QBus framework and built upon it, they added new features, improved performance, and structured the framework in ways that made it easier to work with. So, while QBCore has its roots in QBus, it has its own distinct path.

Key Differences Between QBCore and QBus

Alright, let’s get into specifics. Here’s what makes QBCore and QBus different:

• Structure & Organization: QBCore was designed to be more modular and organised. It is easier for developers to find and modify features. Think of it like this, if QBus was a messy toolbox, QBCore is a well organized one.
• Performance: One of the core aims of QBCore was performance improvements. They streamlined the underlying code to make it more efficient, meaning less lag on servers for players.
• Soutien communautaire: QBCore has built a strong community around itself. This means more resources, tutorials, and support for server owners and developers.
• Active Development: QBCore has become the more actively developed of the two, with regular updates, fixes, and new features.
• Customisation: While both are customisable, the community involvement in QBCore has led to a wealth of custom scripts and additions that are readily available.

Why Does Any of This Matter?

If you’re just playing on a server, this may seem unimportant. But, understanding the difference can give you some insights on what is possible with each framework:

• For Players: Understanding that a server uses QBCore means it’s likely to have a better customisation and is hopefully running with a solid performance.
• For Server Owners: The choice between QBCore and QBus (if that’s even still a choice), will dictate a lot about how easy and efficient it is to build and maintain your server.
• For Developers: If you’re building scripts, knowing which framework is running the server helps you know how to develop, and also know if it will be compatible.

The Verdict: Are They the Same Thing?

So, to wrap it all up, QBCore is NOT QBus, but it wouldn’t be here without it. QBCore evolved from QBus, taking the base and improving upon it to create a modern and capable framework. They share some DNA, but they’ve become distinct entities with different priorities and trajectories.

FAQ

Is QBCore better than QBus?

In most cases, yes. QBCore generally offers better performance, more features and active development.

Can I easily migrate from QBus to QBCore?

It is possible, but not straightforward. It’s a major undertaking, as there is little compatibility between the two. You would most likely have to rebuild from scratch.

Where can I find resources for QBCore development?

The QBCore community on GitHub and Discord are good places to start.

Are there still servers running on QBus?

Yes, but these are rare these days, and not as actively maintained as QBCore servers.

QBCore has emerged as a leading framework for FiveM servers. Knowing its origins and the evolution from ESX to QBus gives a good base of understanding, as well as providing insights into how it continues to be one of the best frameworks available.

A Recap: The Evolutionary Path

Before we get into the functions and code, let’s quickly revisit the family tree. We started with ESX, which was like the Model T of FiveM frameworks – innovative for its time, but clunky by modern standards. Then came QBus, trying to be the better ESX. Then QBCore came, like the car being a fully customisable super car.

QBus attempted to streamline the ESX codebase, focusing on performance and making the server setup process a bit easier. But it still had limitations, especially as server customisation became more complex. QBCore recognised these limitations, and went hard to create a better framework to use.

Core Architectural Differences: The Frameworks Under the Hood

The real divergence between QBCore and QBus lies in their architecture. Here’s a breakdown of how they differ:

• Modularity: QBCore has a far more modular design than QBus. Think of it like Lego – each system (inventory, jobs, housing etc.) is a separate block that can be easily swapped out or modified, without affecting other parts of the game. QBus was a bit more like a single, complex model, where changes in one area would often cause issues elsewhere.
• Gestion des événements: Both frameworks rely heavily on events to communicate between scripts, but QBCore improved this communication. They can pass more complex data efficiently, so scripts can better react to in-game occurrences.
• Data Management: QBCore introduced robust data structures and management systems. It’s designed for scalability and more efficient processing of data from player interactions to item properties.
• Code Style: QBCore encourages a cleaner and more organised coding style. This makes it easier for developers to contribute and modify code, and means that you can add in new developers to your projects with less time spent understanding what is going on.

Key Systems & Examples

Let’s get into some concrete examples. How do these frameworks handle some core functionalities?

Inventory Management

QBus: The inventory system in QBus was a basic extension of ESX, often requiring multiple updates to manage large inventories, and sometimes even caused issues and errors when too many items were in an inventory.

QBCore: QBCore’s system is more advanced. It uses a robust database setup for items, with the ability to have meta-data, like durability, serial numbers etc. It also uses an efficient system to load and unload inventory data and is faster at sending data to clients.

Job Systems

QBus: With QBus, the job system was functional, but needed a lot of effort for complex jobs and roles. It had limited support for things like item creation within a job, and complex job progression was problematic.

QBCore: QBCore comes with a more sophisticated job system. This is built from the ground up to be more modular and adaptable. It has tools for creating custom jobs, with different rank structures, pay scales, and even the ability to create custom items.

Character Customisation

QBus: Character customisation was similar to ESX, with limited options for adding new features or saving complex data, it often required workarounds to manage the process.

QBCore: Here’s where QBCore really shines, with its ability to store and load complex data sets. Character customisation is more versatile, allowing for a wider range of options, such as tattoos, accessories, and unique clothing.

Event Handling & Script Communication

QBus: Used basic events, but it lacked some key functionality when moving large data sets between clients and servers.

QBCore: The event system is designed to be efficient and scalable. It handles custom events efficiently, making real-time communication between different systems more robust.

Why is QBCore more popular?

Okay, so why has QBCore become the dominant force in the FiveM roleplay world? It’s down to several factors:

• Active Development: It is actively developed, with bug fixes, new features, and optimisations rolling out.
• Soutien communautaire: The community is massive. There’s a wealth of custom scripts, and you will find it easier to get help.
• Modern Design: The more modern and efficient design, has resulted in performance gains and a more enjoyable play experience.
• Customisation: The modular and extensible design means server owners can build their dream servers.
• QBus was abandoned in 2021

The Future of FiveM Frameworks

So, as QBCore continues to evolve, the gap between it and other older frameworks like QBus will only continue to widen. Frameworks that don’t keep updating, will become out of date very quickly.

FAQ – Going Deeper

Does QBCore require more resources to run?

Not necessarily. Due to the optimisations, servers using QBCore can be very efficient.

Can I use QBus scripts with QBCore?

In most cases no, due to the way they handle data they won’t be compatible, you will most likely need to find equivalents or rewrite the scripts.

Is QBCore difficult to learn for developers?

The modular design of QBCore makes it easier to learn, compared to older frameworks, as you can work on components individually.

Are there any major downsides to using QBCore?

The major downside is that it is more complex than some simpler frameworks, but that comes with the benefits of more options and features.

QBCore is a major evolution in design, functionality, and community. If you are still wondering what the difference is, it’s similar to asking if a modern car is the same as a very old one. Yes they both have wheels, but that’s where the similarities end.